I public the full text of a comment to my previous post ‘Mr. Rossi Looks for Happiness‘, just received by Andrea Nisto.
Dear Massimo Cali,
I wish to thank you for the Cartoon of Bozzetto: I rememember it Mr. Rossi since I was a kid…
I also share your position concerning the different views of the e-cat and I would like to add a comment taking my cue from the case of Mr. Krivit and his persistence.
I really do not understand why Mr. Krivit, instead of writing rivers of useless words, can’t wait till next October to see the plant that Mr. Rossi has promised to show publicly. Mr. Rossi is not evocating the end of the world, just asking to be patient 8 weeks more before formulating a final opinion on this matter, so no need to fuss or tearing hear out.
If Mr. Krivit can’t stop his huge production of documentation based on the nothingness I can only think of three possible causes:
1. Mr. Krivit is so desperate, cause the lack of news, that he fights a personal battle trying not to loose his job. In this time of crise I humanly understand Mr. Krivit but I invite him to consider that Mr. Rossi’s invention is possibly involving the future of the humankind and of the environment which are more important than his personal business and surely Mr. Rossi deserves a few weeks of benefit of the doubt, if not some support.
2. Mr. Krivit is paid by someone who is damnaged by Rossi’s invention and he rents ‘his pen’ for money without any consideration of his professional ethics and morality. No comment on this eventuality.
3. Mr. Krivit really loves his job and puts his entire heart in it, loosing the control of a balanced and objective view of facts and without any professionality.
May be there are other possible reasons of the behaviour of Mr. Krivit, or just a mix of all of them but I do not mind to inquire because I am sure that next October Mr. Krivit, or Mr. Rossi, will loose their credibility and one of the two will be branded forever: it’s a match that can’t have any parity score.
I have my opinion and my wishes about the end (or let’s call it the beginning) of this story and I do not want to add useless words to oceans of useless words of the ‘pro’ and ‘contra’ fans of Mr. Rossi but just to point out this annoying case as a sample that gives us the measure of how information is administered on the matter of energy (and not only).
By now, there is really poor media coverage about Mr. Rossi’s work: just small and extremely modest media like the one where Mr. Krivit writes, but reporting his case, I wish to signal pre-emptively any possible future power-controlled attacks, misinformation and manipulated news as it daily happens on mass media.
Useless signalation? May be but I think that ‘forewarned is forearmed’.
SEARCH IN THE ARCHIVES
TagAndrea Rossi AR CERN coldfusion cold fusion Daniele Passerini DEFKALION Defkalion Green Technologies Dennis Bushnell E-Cat ecat energy catalyzer Energy Catalyzer Ni-H focardi Francesco Celani Francesco Piantelli Fusione Fredda Giuseppe Levi Greece HYPERION ICCF Italy Japan LENR Leonardo Corporation Low Energy Nuclear Reaction Low Energy Nuclear Reactions Martin Fleischmann Mats Lewan MIT Mitchell Swartz Nasa New Energy Times Nuclear Physics Ny Teknik Peter Hagelstein ROSSI Sergio Focardi Stanley Pons Sterling Allan Steven Krivit Sweden United States US USA