A New Kind of Nuclear Reactor? by Guest Author Dr. Ludwik Kowalski, Montclair State University, in which Dr. Kowalski dives into the Parhomov experiment and makes sense of the particulars for the general reader. Read the original article posted here on Dr. Kowalski’s cold fusion archive. Abstract Consider a short sealed porcelain tube, containing about … Continue reading A New Kind of Nuclear Reactor? →
Tag: DOE
What is Going on Behind Closed Doors Regarding Cold Fusion? (Omega Z)
I would imagine there is much going on behind closed doors. The greatest folly I can imagine would be for people here at ECW to think that many high powered entities are not aware of LENR, E-cat(IH/Rossi), Brillouin(Godes) etc., etc. . . . NASA, DOD, D…
Connect DOE Department of Energy LENR Cold Fusion
To the DOE Office of Information This is the connection I have been looking for since I became interested in LENR. The article is about DOE or so it says and it is correct, except it is really about the part of DOE called NNSA, National Nuclear Security Administration, which is nominally a part of … Continue reading Connect DOE Department of Energy LENR Cold Fusion →
Disconnected DOE
For some time now, since www.science.gov and www.scienceaccelerator.gov first appeared, both of which are sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) and Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), there is still “0” information at the DOE’s home page, www.energy.gov, with respect to either LENR or Cold Fusion. This is hard to understand in … Continue reading Disconnected DOE →
Did the 2004 US DoE review reject cold fusion?
No. “Cold fusion,” as reviewed in 2004, was primarily the Fleischmann-Pons Heat Effect, with palladium deuteride, through electrolytic or gas loading. The review panel was evenly split on the issue of anomalous heat, half considering the evidence for a heat anomaly “compelling.” The only direct evidence that the FP Heat Effect is “nuclear” is the … Continue reading Did the 2004 US DoE review reject cold fusion? →
Economics of Cold Fusion LENR Power US Department of Defense
“Economics of Cold Fusion LENR Power” is a daunting subject for a series of articles, so complex. The savings an Ecat can bring to a homes’ budget was simple enough. I did that before I ordered one. It seemed logical to next take a look at a couple of the largest budgets in the United … Continue reading Economics of Cold Fusion LENR Power US Department of Defense →
$29.5 Billion requested by DoE; $0 for cold fusion
The Department of Energy DoE released their FY2012 Congressional Budget Request Budget Highlights. download .pdf “The Department’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 budget request is $29.5 billion, an 11.8 percent or $3.1 billion increase from FY 2010 current appropriation levels.” “The central theme of this year’s budget in SC [Office of Science] is research in new … Continue reading $29.5 Billion requested by DoE; $0 for cold fusion →
ARPA-E answers questions about fullfilling mission
The House Committee on Space, Science, and Technology’s Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight held a hearing on January 24, 2012 to review the efforts of the Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E), a Department of Energy (DOE) agency tasked with ‘funding cutting-edge energy research “in areas that industry by itself is not likely to … Continue reading ARPA-E answers questions about fullfilling mission →
E-Cat Green Energy Device Discussed By Department Of Energy
In September, Albert Opdenaker – representative from the DEO – was asked in an e-mail to discuss his stand on the E-cat device and the progress of low energy nuclear reactions, shortly known as LENR. Opdenakers response through his assist…
Has US Department of Energy Changed its Mind About Cold Fusion?
Posts at the Independent E-Cat News and the e-catsite.com blogs indicate that the US Department of Energy (DOE) maybe in the process of changing its mind about low energy nuclear reaction. E-catsite reports that Albert L. Opdenaker III a designated fed…
DOE eCat Stance Two Months Apart
In September of this year, the assistant to Al Opdenaker of the DOE answered an email enquiry on the dept.’s LENR stance. The response was not encouraging and Ruby Carat at Cold Fusion Now covered the exchange (and followed it with their own letter and reply). Over the past few weeks, as little hints emerged […]
More “Helpful” E-Mails from the DOE
A friend of mine sent an e-mail regarding Andrea Rossi to the United States Secretary of Energy, Steven Chu, in late October. Of course Secretary Chu did not respond but a couple of his underlings did. Some of the responses … Continue…
US Senate Candidate on LENR and Rossi’s eCat
Ruby Carat at Cold Fusion Now has posted an interview with US Senate candidate Randy Hekman about LENR. A long-time advocate of the science, I’m not sure we can count his support as evidence of a growing awareness in the same way we might think of Romney and Tarr’s apparent interest. No stranger to subject, […]
Did Dr. McKubre Let the E-Cat Out of the Bag?
Dr. McKubrie brought up an issue in his recent presentation at the Science Café that a friend and I have been discussing for months. Lets say Rossi’s device not only does what he claims but does even more and is…
Letters to Congressional Energy Sub-committees repeat hearings request
Why does the Department of Energy refuse to acknowledge LENR science and technology as part of its energy portfolio? Why does the US Patent Office siphon cold fusion patent applications outside of the review channel? A recent mailing sent two dozen letters to the Senate Sub-Committee on Energy and other Senators requesting hearings into these … Continue reading Letters to Congressional Energy Sub-committees repeat hearings request →